Seriously? What does this expression even mean? Gay people are still male or female. Straight people are male or female. Trans people have biological male or female parts. The only people exempt from this classification of male/female are hermaphrodites. In our quest for inclusion of all has our sexual identity become "it", rather than the sex we were born with? Isn't that what neutral implies?
I'm not against homosexuality. I understand how you could be attracted to the same sex as yourself. Transgender? This one I don't understand - not that I'll be an asshole simply because you're different. I do my damnedest to treat all people with respect. However, no matter how much I read about this issue, transgender seems to be more of a psychological confusion than an actual identity with the opposite sex. Bruce Jenner. Need I say more???
That brings me to the current hot topic in Alberta -- the need our ridiculous NDP government feels to force everyone to accept boys and girls changing and using the washroom together based on gender identity. Do I understand the premise for this policy is inclusion? Yep. Do I agree every child should feel included? Yep. However, I think we can all agree we are born male or female.
This policy also states students and staff must use "gender neutral" pronouns when addressing people. Mr. and Mrs. will no longer be acceptable if said person doesn't think he/she is a he/she. If a teacher has gender identity issues, "Hey, You, I need help!" is acceptable and respectful? I don't think so. But, hey, what does a backwards thinking person like me know?
It will also become acceptable for that boy - who thinks he's a girl today (trans fluid) - to come into the change room with your daughters and strip down. Most people are more sexually open than generations past, however, this is a very uncomfortable situation for teenage girls who identify as girls. According to this policy, my daughter must be the one to leave the room if she's uncomfortable. Self-induced exclusion is still exclusion. Explain this: if each and every girl leaves the change room because one boy -- who identifies as a girl -- decides to change with them, how will this person feel? Probably more excluded than they did before this policy was put into play, and they were the ones using a separate change area. Better or worse psychologically? I'd say far worse.
With this policy, we've also just opened the door for blatant sexual harassment to occur at older grade levels. Teens are very bold. To realistically think the boys won't go into the girls wash/change room simply to sneak a peek as a practical joke -- or vice versa -- is naive in the extreme. They merely have to claim they are unsure of the sex they identify with; therefore, they have the to right to go into this change room. Zero repercussions. Is this what we want? Sexually disrespectful kids? We often spout about the lack of respect in society's younger crowd. This policy will create more...
I also believe it will cause confusion for younger children who simply cannot understand this type of difference. I can hear a child in grade two coming home now, "Mommy, lil Jill peed in our bathroom today, and she came out of the stall with her penis showing. Teacher says he identifies as a girl but he has a penis. Am I a boy now???"
The policy states over and over that schools must keep each child safe and comfortable while implementing it. That each child has the "right" to feel safe and comfortable in the school environment. When a child simply has to identify with the sex opposite of their biological sex -- without having had medical/psychological or parental help first -- there is no way this will protect anyone's child. There really is only one solution to inclusion for this type of issue: individual washrooms and change rooms, such as the ones we have at home.
Personally, this policy completely stomps on each and every child's right to privacy and throws society back into the stone age. Enter the Jian Gomeshi's of the world...
Monday, 8 February 2016
Saturday, 14 November 2015
Keep Canada Safe
My heart breaks for the people in Paris suffering so much loss and terror last night. Words cannot express.
However, the rest of us need to start getting serious about protecting our own countries. No doubt there are many cells of these extremists already hiding on our soil, as some have probably been born here. It is an absolute shame these Canadians have been brainwashed to believe in a fanatical and maniacal so-called religion. It's why I regularly say organized religions are evil. Throughout history, many wars have been started in the name of religion. It's time this stopped.
I also don't understand how our own Prime Minister can promote bringing more migrants into our country -- with similar beliefs to these ISIS extremists -- in the name of kindness. I don't think he's watching the world. I don't think he's studied history. The purpose of studying history is to prevent further world atrocities, is it not?
Why are there so many men and such few women and children escaping Syria? Why isn't the media showing the chaos in Sweden -- caused by Islamic people living there -- burning vehicles, attacking emergency workers, etc? Why doesn't the media show the Islamic people in Paris attacking complete strangers on the streets? Is he blind to the implications of these migrants attacking closed borders in Europe -- destroying their tents, clothing and food? Does Trudeau not see this? Does he not question this? Is this what we want here - war, chaos and terror? Have we learned NOTHING from history? The peaceful majority were over run by a mere 7% of Nazi believers. Look at the atrocities that came from 7% of the people.
Oh, I know what Liberal-minded voters will say. That I'm fear-mongering. Racist. Hateful. That's why they voted Stephen Harper out. There was too much common sense coming out of his mouth. I am none of those labels. I also believe there are some very genuine refugees leaving Syria. I believe there are some good people in the Islamic/Muslim faith -- people who believe in peace and understand the freedom of choice. If you truly want to help the refugees: Stop the war. Stop ISIS. We can't stop them by pulling military support out, as Trudeau has done.
Trudeau wants to hug them, love them, give them all of our hard-earned money to support them. What about our homeless? Elderly? Poverty stricken families with barely enough to feed, clothe and house their children? What about those with serious medical conditions who must travel to receive the appropriate care? What about them? Trudeau needs to help our own first.
Now, answer this question: do you honestly want this type of violence on our soil?
That question is why I don't agree with bringing more middle-eastern migrants into our country. I think we will be inviting civil war here. There are too many able-bodied men "escaping" -- without their women and children. To me, that screams infiltration. Why aren't these able-bodied men fighting against ISIS to save their own country? For the numbers leaving, they could have helped overthrow the caliphate by now. They could be living in peace and rebuilding their own country. Why aren't they? Cowards? Definitely. Hidden agenda? Maybe.
Think about this: if civil war were to come to our soil, who do you most want to protect? Can you protect your family, friends, country? Do you have weapons -- and know how to use them? It's pretty hard to protect yourself from a maniacal moron with a bomb strapped to his or her chest.
I have a daughter whom I would not be able to protect from her own body, should we have war on this soil, with no more medications being produced and no power. I can't stock-pile insulin. It has an expiry date. Not to mention, if it gets too warm or too cold, it isn't effective. She's one of many with similar medical issues. Have any of you thought of that when inviting potential terrorists to our soil? Bet you haven't.
The best way to help these migrants, is to keep our western countries safe. For the entire world to arm themselves and go kick ISIS ass.
Trudeau needs to man up and protect the country he was voted in to lead. His first priority are the citizens of Canada. Somehow, watching his lame little speech last night, I doubt he has the capability.
Please. Keep Canada safe. Quit inviting potential terrorism here. Help the migrants by ending the war in their country so they can go home and rebuild.
However, the rest of us need to start getting serious about protecting our own countries. No doubt there are many cells of these extremists already hiding on our soil, as some have probably been born here. It is an absolute shame these Canadians have been brainwashed to believe in a fanatical and maniacal so-called religion. It's why I regularly say organized religions are evil. Throughout history, many wars have been started in the name of religion. It's time this stopped.
I also don't understand how our own Prime Minister can promote bringing more migrants into our country -- with similar beliefs to these ISIS extremists -- in the name of kindness. I don't think he's watching the world. I don't think he's studied history. The purpose of studying history is to prevent further world atrocities, is it not?
Why are there so many men and such few women and children escaping Syria? Why isn't the media showing the chaos in Sweden -- caused by Islamic people living there -- burning vehicles, attacking emergency workers, etc? Why doesn't the media show the Islamic people in Paris attacking complete strangers on the streets? Is he blind to the implications of these migrants attacking closed borders in Europe -- destroying their tents, clothing and food? Does Trudeau not see this? Does he not question this? Is this what we want here - war, chaos and terror? Have we learned NOTHING from history? The peaceful majority were over run by a mere 7% of Nazi believers. Look at the atrocities that came from 7% of the people.
Oh, I know what Liberal-minded voters will say. That I'm fear-mongering. Racist. Hateful. That's why they voted Stephen Harper out. There was too much common sense coming out of his mouth. I am none of those labels. I also believe there are some very genuine refugees leaving Syria. I believe there are some good people in the Islamic/Muslim faith -- people who believe in peace and understand the freedom of choice. If you truly want to help the refugees: Stop the war. Stop ISIS. We can't stop them by pulling military support out, as Trudeau has done.
Trudeau wants to hug them, love them, give them all of our hard-earned money to support them. What about our homeless? Elderly? Poverty stricken families with barely enough to feed, clothe and house their children? What about those with serious medical conditions who must travel to receive the appropriate care? What about them? Trudeau needs to help our own first.
Now, answer this question: do you honestly want this type of violence on our soil?
That question is why I don't agree with bringing more middle-eastern migrants into our country. I think we will be inviting civil war here. There are too many able-bodied men "escaping" -- without their women and children. To me, that screams infiltration. Why aren't these able-bodied men fighting against ISIS to save their own country? For the numbers leaving, they could have helped overthrow the caliphate by now. They could be living in peace and rebuilding their own country. Why aren't they? Cowards? Definitely. Hidden agenda? Maybe.
Think about this: if civil war were to come to our soil, who do you most want to protect? Can you protect your family, friends, country? Do you have weapons -- and know how to use them? It's pretty hard to protect yourself from a maniacal moron with a bomb strapped to his or her chest.
I have a daughter whom I would not be able to protect from her own body, should we have war on this soil, with no more medications being produced and no power. I can't stock-pile insulin. It has an expiry date. Not to mention, if it gets too warm or too cold, it isn't effective. She's one of many with similar medical issues. Have any of you thought of that when inviting potential terrorists to our soil? Bet you haven't.
The best way to help these migrants, is to keep our western countries safe. For the entire world to arm themselves and go kick ISIS ass.
Trudeau needs to man up and protect the country he was voted in to lead. His first priority are the citizens of Canada. Somehow, watching his lame little speech last night, I doubt he has the capability.
Please. Keep Canada safe. Quit inviting potential terrorism here. Help the migrants by ending the war in their country so they can go home and rebuild.
Friday, 18 September 2015
Tax Off
Know what I'm tired of? Large health organizations and health professionals who do expensive studies -- only to tell us that if we tax "XYZ", it will prevent people from doing "XYZ" so we'll have a healthier population.
My latest issue is with the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA). They want all of us to make their little campaign an election issue. Why? Not really sure, since one of the issues they want the government to "change" is already in place and fairly easy to access. Let me explain.
The first on their agenda is they want the government to put a tax on "sugary" beverages, in an effort to prevent Type 2 Diabetes. If you look at their definition of a "sugary drink", it is to include non-diet pop, sweetened iced teas, sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit flavoured drinks (such as fruit punch or vitamin waters) and blended coffee drinks.
Now, I think we would all agree that basically everything on the shelf has exorbitant amounts of added sugar (or carbs that your body converts to sugar). For example: a medium-sized orange has approximately 15 g of carb (sugar). A glass of OJ (pretty much any brand) has approximately 30 g of carb (sugar) per cup. By the definition of "sugary", I'd assume OJ is going to fall in that category -- and if not, it damn well should.
Why do I think this is the wrong approach??? Look at the crazy taxes on cigarettes. Yet, thousands and thousands of people still smoke. Basically, this analogy prevents nothing. People know very well smoking is bad for them. They know consuming too much sugar is also bad for them. You cannot control with taxation. People still do what they choose to do, regardless of having to pay more.
My next question is this: will all the tax money generated from sugary beverages go directly to our health care system to help fund medications, insulin pumps, CGM's, education, etc. for those with diabetes? Not likely -- but that's exactly where the money should go.
The other reason I disagree with this tax is my Type 1 daughter needs fast-acting sugar to correct lows; and, basically, that's every drink the CDA wants taxed. Not to mention, in times of illness, we use sports drinks (regular and diet) to help keep her hydrated. Sorry, CDA, but sometimes diabetics need these beverages so they don't die. Now you expect every insulin-dependent diabetic to pay more for the drinks they need??? Low blood sugars are unpredictable.
Diabetics pay enough. Without insurance, supplies for a Type 1 average $600/month with insulin pump therapy. This cost doesn't include emergency supplies, such as juice boxes. Let's not add to that expense. Please.
Next, they want to see changes to the Disability Tax Credit to include people with Type 1 Diabetes. Hate to break it to the CDA, but they are a few steps behind the times. We have been receiving this Tax Credit for my daughter for 2 1/2 years out of her 4 1/2 years with this disease -- and were back-paid to the date of her diagnoses. The only area with the application that is somewhat tricky, is proving you spend approximately 14 hours per week managing the disease. I was lucky enough to be part of an online support group with one of the members being a very active advocate. Just go to her page www.diabetesadvocacy.com, under the "Disability Tax Credit" tab and you will find the detailed information you need to qualify.
Their final -- and only item I agree with -- is to provide financial aide for diabetics in regards to their medication. Some provinces have programs for pump supplies but not funding in place for those without insurance or no insulin pump. Diabetes is a costly disease.
However, these next issues also need to be addressed immediately. Funding for earlier screening needs to be provided -- as this is one reason many with Type 2 have significant side-effects caused by the disease, such as heart problems, kidney failure, nerve damage and blindness. A recent report I read stated many Type 2's have had the disease go undetected for approximately 10 years. We need to improve this.
There should also be better education for Type 2's and continuous support for both Type 1's and 2's. I've spoken to many Type 2's who have zero clue what to watch for with their diets, eg. carbs or how to match their meds to their food. For the insulin dependent Type 2, they have no clue how their long-acting and short-acting insulin works -- or which to adjust if their numbers are high. Heck, many don't even understand what basal insulin vs. bolus insulin is. Without this knowledge, it is virtually impossible to improve -- or maintain -- the status of your health.
Also, there is a huge stigma placed on people with Type 2 that they caused their disease. That they should have been able to prevent it. In the case of those with genetic pre-dispositions, people often have done everything right -- yet are still diagnosed with Type 2. It's completely unfair to put this stigma on anyone with any disease. It makes it harder -- mentally and emotionally -- to manage. Therefore, the public should be properly educated to prevent this stigma.
I believe these are the true underlying reason diabetes is reaching epidemic proportions and putting such a huge strain on our health care. Proper education truly needs to be addressed.
Maybe the CDA could change their campaign to include these issues and remove the redundancy of taxation. Let's educate, rather than make treating a disease more costly than it already is.
#diabetes
My latest issue is with the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA). They want all of us to make their little campaign an election issue. Why? Not really sure, since one of the issues they want the government to "change" is already in place and fairly easy to access. Let me explain.
The first on their agenda is they want the government to put a tax on "sugary" beverages, in an effort to prevent Type 2 Diabetes. If you look at their definition of a "sugary drink", it is to include non-diet pop, sweetened iced teas, sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit flavoured drinks (such as fruit punch or vitamin waters) and blended coffee drinks.
Now, I think we would all agree that basically everything on the shelf has exorbitant amounts of added sugar (or carbs that your body converts to sugar). For example: a medium-sized orange has approximately 15 g of carb (sugar). A glass of OJ (pretty much any brand) has approximately 30 g of carb (sugar) per cup. By the definition of "sugary", I'd assume OJ is going to fall in that category -- and if not, it damn well should.
Why do I think this is the wrong approach??? Look at the crazy taxes on cigarettes. Yet, thousands and thousands of people still smoke. Basically, this analogy prevents nothing. People know very well smoking is bad for them. They know consuming too much sugar is also bad for them. You cannot control with taxation. People still do what they choose to do, regardless of having to pay more.
My next question is this: will all the tax money generated from sugary beverages go directly to our health care system to help fund medications, insulin pumps, CGM's, education, etc. for those with diabetes? Not likely -- but that's exactly where the money should go.
The other reason I disagree with this tax is my Type 1 daughter needs fast-acting sugar to correct lows; and, basically, that's every drink the CDA wants taxed. Not to mention, in times of illness, we use sports drinks (regular and diet) to help keep her hydrated. Sorry, CDA, but sometimes diabetics need these beverages so they don't die. Now you expect every insulin-dependent diabetic to pay more for the drinks they need??? Low blood sugars are unpredictable.
Diabetics pay enough. Without insurance, supplies for a Type 1 average $600/month with insulin pump therapy. This cost doesn't include emergency supplies, such as juice boxes. Let's not add to that expense. Please.
Next, they want to see changes to the Disability Tax Credit to include people with Type 1 Diabetes. Hate to break it to the CDA, but they are a few steps behind the times. We have been receiving this Tax Credit for my daughter for 2 1/2 years out of her 4 1/2 years with this disease -- and were back-paid to the date of her diagnoses. The only area with the application that is somewhat tricky, is proving you spend approximately 14 hours per week managing the disease. I was lucky enough to be part of an online support group with one of the members being a very active advocate. Just go to her page www.diabetesadvocacy.com, under the "Disability Tax Credit" tab and you will find the detailed information you need to qualify.
Their final -- and only item I agree with -- is to provide financial aide for diabetics in regards to their medication. Some provinces have programs for pump supplies but not funding in place for those without insurance or no insulin pump. Diabetes is a costly disease.
However, these next issues also need to be addressed immediately. Funding for earlier screening needs to be provided -- as this is one reason many with Type 2 have significant side-effects caused by the disease, such as heart problems, kidney failure, nerve damage and blindness. A recent report I read stated many Type 2's have had the disease go undetected for approximately 10 years. We need to improve this.
There should also be better education for Type 2's and continuous support for both Type 1's and 2's. I've spoken to many Type 2's who have zero clue what to watch for with their diets, eg. carbs or how to match their meds to their food. For the insulin dependent Type 2, they have no clue how their long-acting and short-acting insulin works -- or which to adjust if their numbers are high. Heck, many don't even understand what basal insulin vs. bolus insulin is. Without this knowledge, it is virtually impossible to improve -- or maintain -- the status of your health.
Also, there is a huge stigma placed on people with Type 2 that they caused their disease. That they should have been able to prevent it. In the case of those with genetic pre-dispositions, people often have done everything right -- yet are still diagnosed with Type 2. It's completely unfair to put this stigma on anyone with any disease. It makes it harder -- mentally and emotionally -- to manage. Therefore, the public should be properly educated to prevent this stigma.
I believe these are the true underlying reason diabetes is reaching epidemic proportions and putting such a huge strain on our health care. Proper education truly needs to be addressed.
Maybe the CDA could change their campaign to include these issues and remove the redundancy of taxation. Let's educate, rather than make treating a disease more costly than it already is.
#diabetes
Thursday, 3 September 2015
Cell Phones in School
This is a very hot topic on social media right now, after a picture popped up stating the following:
First, every adult who agreed whole-heartedly with kids not having their phones at school are the same people who expect to have full access to their cells while at work. Not to mention, these adults probably bought the phone for their kids in the first place. Also, for every adult who agreed, do you allow your kid to take their phone to school? Bet you do. Few workplaces insist their employees put their phones away, unless they are front-line retail workers. So why are adults insisting kids put their phones away? Set an example. Adults, put yours away first.
Next, why are you judging the reason behind someone else's kid having a cell phone in the first place? Are you their parent? Do you know the reasons behind them having one? Do you know the rules the parents have placed on them having the phone? Who are you to judge why my kid -- or anyone else's -- has one? Are you paying for it? No? Then take a healthy dose of "Shut the Fuck Up" and mind your own business.
Now, many teachers at the junior high level and up allow the kids to use their cell phones in class to research social studies projects and various other projects. Access to computer labs at school isn't always easy. They are a great learning tool. It teaches kids responsibility and how to use their devices wisely in a controlled environment. Kids love their devices -- NOT just to text their buddies but for the information they can find at the press of a button. Both of my kids find some very interesting facts about the subjects they like. Hell, I've researched tons of things on my cell phone -- things I would've forgotten to look up later had I not had a cell. Again, for all you adults who say they shouldn't be in the class room, update your thinking and open your mind to new learning styles. Kids learn exceptionally well this way.
What about the odd kid who has no cell phone? How does that kid make sure they are marked present? When teachers take away expensive devices, are they going to be held responsible for private property that gets stolen? Lost? Broken? What security measures do teachers like this have in place so the kids get their phones back? Let me guess: they don't and will summarily refuse to accept responsibility.
My final complaint about this discussion is how mean people are to those of us who believe kids should be allowed to have their phones with them. There is NO NEED for the kind of cruel comments that smack loudly of school-yard bullies. Don't like the reason someone has a phone for their child -- whether it's a chronic disease or to help keep them safe while they walk to and from school? Scroll by. There's no need to say "your kid had blah, blah, blah 30 years ago and survived school just fine". Or kids were safe enough 30 years ago walking to and from school. Good for you, but I guarantee if you'd had access to this technology 30 years ago, you would've used it. Also, let's not forget that many teachers today won't take responsibility for a kid's medical issues -- 30 years ago, they did. Also, the world was a safer place 30 years ago, so you knew your kid was going to be fine going to and from school. Because people were kinder 30 years ago -- we've morphed into a planet full of self-centered idiots.
Better yet, how about we just drop the double-standards? If you expect kids not to have phones at school, then I expect each and everyone of you to NEVER have your phones at work. If you don't believe kids should have cell phones, then make sure yours doesn't before you go pointing fingers. Because, honestly, I've seen more rudeness from adults regarding cell phone use than I have ever seen from kids.
Let's also recognize smart phones for their educational capabilities. They are not evil, little devices that turn the human race into zombies. If that's how you view them, then I hope you don't own one -- or a computer, for that matter. Unfortunately, I know many of you own both -- because I've read your ignorant comments.
Bottom line is this: everyone does what is best for them and their situation. Outside opinions don't matter. Keep them to yourself.
"A teacher decided that in order for his students to be marked present, they have to put their cell phones into one of these slots at the start of class, which they will get back after class is finished."Many adults agreed with this statement. However, I don't. I'll list the many reasons why I disagree with this.
First, every adult who agreed whole-heartedly with kids not having their phones at school are the same people who expect to have full access to their cells while at work. Not to mention, these adults probably bought the phone for their kids in the first place. Also, for every adult who agreed, do you allow your kid to take their phone to school? Bet you do. Few workplaces insist their employees put their phones away, unless they are front-line retail workers. So why are adults insisting kids put their phones away? Set an example. Adults, put yours away first.
Next, why are you judging the reason behind someone else's kid having a cell phone in the first place? Are you their parent? Do you know the reasons behind them having one? Do you know the rules the parents have placed on them having the phone? Who are you to judge why my kid -- or anyone else's -- has one? Are you paying for it? No? Then take a healthy dose of "Shut the Fuck Up" and mind your own business.
Now, many teachers at the junior high level and up allow the kids to use their cell phones in class to research social studies projects and various other projects. Access to computer labs at school isn't always easy. They are a great learning tool. It teaches kids responsibility and how to use their devices wisely in a controlled environment. Kids love their devices -- NOT just to text their buddies but for the information they can find at the press of a button. Both of my kids find some very interesting facts about the subjects they like. Hell, I've researched tons of things on my cell phone -- things I would've forgotten to look up later had I not had a cell. Again, for all you adults who say they shouldn't be in the class room, update your thinking and open your mind to new learning styles. Kids learn exceptionally well this way.
What about the odd kid who has no cell phone? How does that kid make sure they are marked present? When teachers take away expensive devices, are they going to be held responsible for private property that gets stolen? Lost? Broken? What security measures do teachers like this have in place so the kids get their phones back? Let me guess: they don't and will summarily refuse to accept responsibility.
My final complaint about this discussion is how mean people are to those of us who believe kids should be allowed to have their phones with them. There is NO NEED for the kind of cruel comments that smack loudly of school-yard bullies. Don't like the reason someone has a phone for their child -- whether it's a chronic disease or to help keep them safe while they walk to and from school? Scroll by. There's no need to say "your kid had blah, blah, blah 30 years ago and survived school just fine". Or kids were safe enough 30 years ago walking to and from school. Good for you, but I guarantee if you'd had access to this technology 30 years ago, you would've used it. Also, let's not forget that many teachers today won't take responsibility for a kid's medical issues -- 30 years ago, they did. Also, the world was a safer place 30 years ago, so you knew your kid was going to be fine going to and from school. Because people were kinder 30 years ago -- we've morphed into a planet full of self-centered idiots.
Better yet, how about we just drop the double-standards? If you expect kids not to have phones at school, then I expect each and everyone of you to NEVER have your phones at work. If you don't believe kids should have cell phones, then make sure yours doesn't before you go pointing fingers. Because, honestly, I've seen more rudeness from adults regarding cell phone use than I have ever seen from kids.
Let's also recognize smart phones for their educational capabilities. They are not evil, little devices that turn the human race into zombies. If that's how you view them, then I hope you don't own one -- or a computer, for that matter. Unfortunately, I know many of you own both -- because I've read your ignorant comments.
Bottom line is this: everyone does what is best for them and their situation. Outside opinions don't matter. Keep them to yourself.
Wednesday, 15 July 2015
Type 1 Diabetes Misdiagnoses
Over this past weekend, two young children lost their lives. They were not properly diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes and severe complications arose. My condolences to their families. I cannot imagine their pain.
Sad stories like this make me acutely aware how lucky we were to have our own kiddo properly diagnosed 4 1/2 years ago.
Her symptoms were exactly the same as these two little angels. I thought she just had a stomach-flu with severe dehydration. Unfortunately, she was in full-blown DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis) with blood glucose of 54 (or 972 for my U.S. counterparts). Absolutely no clue what level her ketones were at. Having the knowledge I do now, I realize she was close to a coma.
We were insanely lucky the doctors in emergency that night immediately recognized her symptoms, as I rattled them off, after bursting through the double doors.
It is discouraging when so many in the medical profession really have no clue about Type 1 Diabetes. More education is needed for the all medical staff, particularly in Emergency Departments. I could tell you stories that would blow your mind, but I don't want to detract from the real reason I'm writing this.
Type 1 Diabetes doesn't always present itself with the more common symptoms of extreme thirst, excessive urination or sudden weight loss. In fact, I'm very jealous of the parents whose children present this way because their babies don't have to become extremely ill like my baby did.
My girl wasn't well for a few months before she was diagnosed. However, it wasn't anything you could put your finger on. She simply didn't feel well for a couple of days and then her pancreas would kick in, producing insulin once more, and she'd be good for a couple of weeks or so.
Two days before she was diagnosed, I noticed she looked a bit thinner than usual. I shuffled that to the back of my mind to pay attention, especially since she was hungrier than usual. Less than twenty-four hours before her diagnosis, she was crazy thirsty -- downed about 4 L of apple juice in just a couple of hours. Mama Radar went up again; something was wrong. The next morning, she was throwing up. Mama Radar sighed -- just a stomach flu. Every time she drank anything, she'd throw up. Less than eight hours later, she was so dehydrated her eyes had sunken into her face with the blackest circles you will ever see. She'd visibly lost more weight. I rushed her to the ER to discover within minutes she was Type 1 Diabetic. We began a terrifying, information-overloaded journey that night. It's a bit smoother now, but T1D is a demanding disease.
More education is needed for Type 1 Diabetes diagnoses so our babies don't die, like the two little angels this weekend. Symptoms are:
#diabetes
Sad stories like this make me acutely aware how lucky we were to have our own kiddo properly diagnosed 4 1/2 years ago.
Her symptoms were exactly the same as these two little angels. I thought she just had a stomach-flu with severe dehydration. Unfortunately, she was in full-blown DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis) with blood glucose of 54 (or 972 for my U.S. counterparts). Absolutely no clue what level her ketones were at. Having the knowledge I do now, I realize she was close to a coma.
We were insanely lucky the doctors in emergency that night immediately recognized her symptoms, as I rattled them off, after bursting through the double doors.
It is discouraging when so many in the medical profession really have no clue about Type 1 Diabetes. More education is needed for the all medical staff, particularly in Emergency Departments. I could tell you stories that would blow your mind, but I don't want to detract from the real reason I'm writing this.
Type 1 Diabetes doesn't always present itself with the more common symptoms of extreme thirst, excessive urination or sudden weight loss. In fact, I'm very jealous of the parents whose children present this way because their babies don't have to become extremely ill like my baby did.
My girl wasn't well for a few months before she was diagnosed. However, it wasn't anything you could put your finger on. She simply didn't feel well for a couple of days and then her pancreas would kick in, producing insulin once more, and she'd be good for a couple of weeks or so.
Two days before she was diagnosed, I noticed she looked a bit thinner than usual. I shuffled that to the back of my mind to pay attention, especially since she was hungrier than usual. Less than twenty-four hours before her diagnosis, she was crazy thirsty -- downed about 4 L of apple juice in just a couple of hours. Mama Radar went up again; something was wrong. The next morning, she was throwing up. Mama Radar sighed -- just a stomach flu. Every time she drank anything, she'd throw up. Less than eight hours later, she was so dehydrated her eyes had sunken into her face with the blackest circles you will ever see. She'd visibly lost more weight. I rushed her to the ER to discover within minutes she was Type 1 Diabetic. We began a terrifying, information-overloaded journey that night. It's a bit smoother now, but T1D is a demanding disease.
More education is needed for Type 1 Diabetes diagnoses so our babies don't die, like the two little angels this weekend. Symptoms are:
- flu-like symptoms
- extreme thirst
- sudden weight loss
- excessive urination
- not feeling well with no obvious reason
- hungrier than usual
#diabetes
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Authority Abusers
You know, I usually make my kids toe the rule line. Meaning, teach them to respect people in authority and follow rules laid out by those in charge -- even when the rules are stupid, although I do allow them to push the stupid rules. Because, seriously, as adults we question rules that make no sense. It doesn't mean we're disrespectful, as adults. So why is it disrespect for kids -- especially teenagers -- to question rules that aren't right?
To me, the ability to learn to question things that are wrong is part of becoming an adult. As an adult, you better be able to explain the reason behind that rule to a teen. Nicely, despite the attitude rolling in waves off the teen. Yes, I know how hard the "nicely" is to accomplish. I have two teens. Truthfully? There are many times, I don't accomplish the explanation nicely with my teens.
However, there are many people in places of authority who abuse the power of their position. From police officers to politicians, school principals to managers. What amazes me is how these authority abusers have no idea how to handle a person who:
a) has a brain and can talk in a common sense manner, and;
b) has the balls to stand up to them when they abuse their authority.
Let's backtrack to my daughter's final half day at I.V. Macklin Public School. Her principal decides to go on the warpath because some girls in grade 8 "planned" to thwart her on the dress code rules. None of the grade 8 girls will be back in that school next year. I'm going to add that my daughter wasn't one of the girls in on this plan. She simply didn't want to sweat to death on the final day of school. So what point was this authority abuser trying to make??? I still haven't figured that out, considering she absolutely refused to answer my question. The other question I asked, which she also categorically refused to answer, was why would she even bother to pull rank on dress code for the final 3 1/2 hours of the school year -- mostly with girls who wouldn't be returning?
Not to mention, the woman couldn't speak without yelling at me. At one point she was about 3" from my face screaming about how it was her school, her rules, and no one but her got to make them. Well, we all know that's bullshit since it's actually the school board who makes the rules. She just gets to attempt to enforce them. Only problem is, you also have to use a little common sense when enforcing rules. Last and final day is NOT the time to decide to be an arrogant, power-tripping twat waffle. Unless, of course, your intention is to have multiple parents jumping down your throat for your galactic stupidity.
However, in my daughter's case, the issue was quickly turned away from the clothing -- which was completely appropriate with no body parts hanging out that shouldn't have been -- to the fact she had texted me from the office to "tattle". Once said principal realized this she asked my daughter to put her phone away. She placed it face-down on her lap -- no pockets big enough to place it in and no backpack with her. The prinicipal's next response was a verbal attempt at confiscating her phone, to which my daughter responded with full-on teenage attitude and told her she'd better call her mom, repeating several times she needed to call mom because she wasn't allowed to confiscate her phone.
Sorry, but every teacher, principal, and vice principal has been told never to confiscate her phone due to medical reasons. If adults can't abide by a simple rule designed to keep my child safe, why does my kid have to follow your rules??? Rules you often twist to your advantage???
Unfortunately, every year, for the last 4 1/2 years, we've had to do battle over this issue. With at least one teacher, principal or vice-principal. WHY??? Why can't these people just listen??? She needs her phone to be able to talk to me about her Type 1 Diabetes, whenever and wherever she may be.
While this so-called professional was screaming at me about my daughter's attitude about her phone, I asked why she'd even bothered trying to take it? Reminded her that she'd been informed a few times this is an absolute no-no. Not for any reason. She very arrogantly told me that she wasn't using it for medical purposes, but to tattle.
Yes. Yes, she was tattling on you. Because you were standing there yelling at her, attempting to pull rank in an area you have all been instructed not to. She has full rights to notify her parents and refuse to speak to you when someone in your position has forgotten what it is to treat a child with dignity and respect. We've repeatedly told both of our girls not to speak when pulled into the office for something stupid like this. The only thing they are to say is: Call my mom and dad. Call my mom and dad.
In my mind, this woman's actual problem was her "authority carpet" got firmly yanked out from under her arrogant, authority-abusing feet. When faced with common sense questions pointing to just this fact, she refused to answer. The reason she felt it necessary to scream is because she knew she was wrong to pull this stunt. People who get this upset usually are wrong and they know it. That's why they scream.
But you know what? I'm exhausted of this battle over the phone for people who have absolutely no clue how quickly my daughter's blood glucose can change. Stress, excitement, exercise, hormones, illness and many other factors play a role in blood glucose. And, YES, this can change very quickly in certain circumstances. I've watched her go from an in-range number to dangerously low in a matter of fifteen minutes. I've also seen her blood glucose sky-rocket in a similar manner -- for no apparent reason.
Due to the stress this power-tripping principal put my daughter under, her blood glucose sky-rocketed. It took all day to bring her back into range. So most definitely, her texting me had to do with her health -- even if you didn't think it did.
Bottom line is this: unless you deal with this chronic and life threatening disease every, single day, your opinion of what is necessary doesn't count. Got that? Especially when you have no medical training. My teenage daughter carries a far heavier weight and responsibility than 90% of the adults out there. One mistake could cost her life. Really. So kindly back the fuck off.
Before you lose your shit on the next kid whose parent steps on your authority-abusing toes, you might use your head to think about the kid's circumstances. Then categorically pull your abusive head out of your ass, call said kid's parents and speak to them -- not yell -- speak. If you insist on yelling at adults, just remember, they will yell back because we aren't kids -- or stupid -- nor do we have to take your shit. Got that?
#grandeprairiepublicschooldistrict
#typeonediabetes
To me, the ability to learn to question things that are wrong is part of becoming an adult. As an adult, you better be able to explain the reason behind that rule to a teen. Nicely, despite the attitude rolling in waves off the teen. Yes, I know how hard the "nicely" is to accomplish. I have two teens. Truthfully? There are many times, I don't accomplish the explanation nicely with my teens.
However, there are many people in places of authority who abuse the power of their position. From police officers to politicians, school principals to managers. What amazes me is how these authority abusers have no idea how to handle a person who:
a) has a brain and can talk in a common sense manner, and;
b) has the balls to stand up to them when they abuse their authority.
Let's backtrack to my daughter's final half day at I.V. Macklin Public School. Her principal decides to go on the warpath because some girls in grade 8 "planned" to thwart her on the dress code rules. None of the grade 8 girls will be back in that school next year. I'm going to add that my daughter wasn't one of the girls in on this plan. She simply didn't want to sweat to death on the final day of school. So what point was this authority abuser trying to make??? I still haven't figured that out, considering she absolutely refused to answer my question. The other question I asked, which she also categorically refused to answer, was why would she even bother to pull rank on dress code for the final 3 1/2 hours of the school year -- mostly with girls who wouldn't be returning?
Not to mention, the woman couldn't speak without yelling at me. At one point she was about 3" from my face screaming about how it was her school, her rules, and no one but her got to make them. Well, we all know that's bullshit since it's actually the school board who makes the rules. She just gets to attempt to enforce them. Only problem is, you also have to use a little common sense when enforcing rules. Last and final day is NOT the time to decide to be an arrogant, power-tripping twat waffle. Unless, of course, your intention is to have multiple parents jumping down your throat for your galactic stupidity.
However, in my daughter's case, the issue was quickly turned away from the clothing -- which was completely appropriate with no body parts hanging out that shouldn't have been -- to the fact she had texted me from the office to "tattle". Once said principal realized this she asked my daughter to put her phone away. She placed it face-down on her lap -- no pockets big enough to place it in and no backpack with her. The prinicipal's next response was a verbal attempt at confiscating her phone, to which my daughter responded with full-on teenage attitude and told her she'd better call her mom, repeating several times she needed to call mom because she wasn't allowed to confiscate her phone.
Sorry, but every teacher, principal, and vice principal has been told never to confiscate her phone due to medical reasons. If adults can't abide by a simple rule designed to keep my child safe, why does my kid have to follow your rules??? Rules you often twist to your advantage???
Unfortunately, every year, for the last 4 1/2 years, we've had to do battle over this issue. With at least one teacher, principal or vice-principal. WHY??? Why can't these people just listen??? She needs her phone to be able to talk to me about her Type 1 Diabetes, whenever and wherever she may be.
While this so-called professional was screaming at me about my daughter's attitude about her phone, I asked why she'd even bothered trying to take it? Reminded her that she'd been informed a few times this is an absolute no-no. Not for any reason. She very arrogantly told me that she wasn't using it for medical purposes, but to tattle.
Yes. Yes, she was tattling on you. Because you were standing there yelling at her, attempting to pull rank in an area you have all been instructed not to. She has full rights to notify her parents and refuse to speak to you when someone in your position has forgotten what it is to treat a child with dignity and respect. We've repeatedly told both of our girls not to speak when pulled into the office for something stupid like this. The only thing they are to say is: Call my mom and dad. Call my mom and dad.
In my mind, this woman's actual problem was her "authority carpet" got firmly yanked out from under her arrogant, authority-abusing feet. When faced with common sense questions pointing to just this fact, she refused to answer. The reason she felt it necessary to scream is because she knew she was wrong to pull this stunt. People who get this upset usually are wrong and they know it. That's why they scream.
But you know what? I'm exhausted of this battle over the phone for people who have absolutely no clue how quickly my daughter's blood glucose can change. Stress, excitement, exercise, hormones, illness and many other factors play a role in blood glucose. And, YES, this can change very quickly in certain circumstances. I've watched her go from an in-range number to dangerously low in a matter of fifteen minutes. I've also seen her blood glucose sky-rocket in a similar manner -- for no apparent reason.
Due to the stress this power-tripping principal put my daughter under, her blood glucose sky-rocketed. It took all day to bring her back into range. So most definitely, her texting me had to do with her health -- even if you didn't think it did.
Bottom line is this: unless you deal with this chronic and life threatening disease every, single day, your opinion of what is necessary doesn't count. Got that? Especially when you have no medical training. My teenage daughter carries a far heavier weight and responsibility than 90% of the adults out there. One mistake could cost her life. Really. So kindly back the fuck off.
Before you lose your shit on the next kid whose parent steps on your authority-abusing toes, you might use your head to think about the kid's circumstances. Then categorically pull your abusive head out of your ass, call said kid's parents and speak to them -- not yell -- speak. If you insist on yelling at adults, just remember, they will yell back because we aren't kids -- or stupid -- nor do we have to take your shit. Got that?
#grandeprairiepublicschooldistrict
#typeonediabetes
Monday, 8 June 2015
Judgement and Type 1 Diabetes
We've been dealing with this disease for almost 4 1/2 years now. The thing I struggle with most now is the constant judgement. Judgement comes from every side: professionals who are supposed to help you, people who know nothing about diabetes speaking like experts, and media spreading false information. Was it there at diagnosis? Probably. But here's the thing: you are too busy learning how to care for your child to reduce the long-term side effects this disease causes to hear what people say.
People went out of their way to help in the beginning. Things like making sure there were sugar-free snacks/drinks at birthday parties and special school days. Asking tons of questions. Encouraging statements. Medical professionals were more supportive with thoughtful comments and suggestions. Heck, we were totally spoiled to have a nurse for one year whose grown daughter has T1D.
Four and a half years later, I swear everyone has more ridiculous questions, but I'm sure it's just because I've heard them soooo many times they drive me crazy now. Things like:
Please don't tell me that cinnamon totally regulates your blood sugar levels -- even though you have a fully working pancreas. Or that eating too much sugar caused my kid's chronic disease. Or have you tried -- insert totally ridiculous suggestion here -- to cure her? Seriously, if it was that simple to cure this disease, don't you think it would have been eradicated by now???
Please, as a professional, before you comment, ask questions. Make sure you know what place we are at. Just because we aren't new to this disease, doesn't mean we aren't struggling in one area. We still need support -- even if it's just someone who understands the disease and the level of difficulty it presents, both emotionally and physically.
If you are just a regular person, ask me all the questions you want. I'll explain how this disease works in our world, but, remember, it affects everyone differently. What works for my girl may not work for the next person you run into with this disease. There is currently no cure -- although millions of people wish there were. Please. Stop spreading misinformation.
Eating too much sugar or being sedentary does not cause any type of diabetes. It may be a factor but not necessarily a THE cause. Genetics also play a very strong role and poor life style choices may simply Type 2 to the forefront.
I think it's terribly unfair to blame anyone with Type 2 diabetes for a disease they probably could not have prevented. We certainly don't blame cancer patients for their disease -- even though they may have exposed themselves to cancer causing things in their lifestyles, such as tanning beds or cigarettes. Nor do we blame people with heart disease for eating too much salt or red meats. It just is.
So let's stop blaming people with diabetes for their disease. They didn't cause it either.
#typeonediabetes
#diabetes
People went out of their way to help in the beginning. Things like making sure there were sugar-free snacks/drinks at birthday parties and special school days. Asking tons of questions. Encouraging statements. Medical professionals were more supportive with thoughtful comments and suggestions. Heck, we were totally spoiled to have a nurse for one year whose grown daughter has T1D.
Four and a half years later, I swear everyone has more ridiculous questions, but I'm sure it's just because I've heard them soooo many times they drive me crazy now. Things like:
- Did your kid eat too much sugar when she was young? NO.
- Was she active? YES.
- Family history? Kind of. Lots of Type 2 on the hubby's side and my mother's cousin has Type 1.
- Why do you let her have cake, ice cream, cookies? Isn't she supposed to have zero sugar? Well, hmm. Do you eat cake? Then she can, too, she just has to TAKE INSULIN.
- Foods teachers who constantly "encourage" her to use Splenda in her baking projects -- after being told repeatedly by me and my girl that it ruins baking, so NO we don't bake with it. Not to mention that Splenda doesn't lower the overall carb count by enough to ruin otherwise tasty food.
- Kids who bring cookies to school for the class and by-pass my girl because she can't "have" sugar. Or adults who say my girl "rarely" gets to have these kinds of treats because guess what? She does. Since you don't live with us, perhaps you could not spread misinformation.
- A pump and CGM (continuous glucose monitor) is a cure. A better treatment, YES; cure, NO.
- How does her pump know she's low/high in the middle of the night? It doesn't. Mom gets up to check -- sometimes multiple times in one night.
- Nurses who haven't seen you or your kid for six months asking how many times you've adjusted insulin rates. Please tell me you didn't just ask that!!
- Family doctors who tell you they know nothing about Type 1 but insist you see them every time your kid needs prescriptions renewed. Why??? You're the one who said you know nothing about her disease, so, please, just send our usual pharmacy a renewal. Don't waste my time. Or hers.
- Newspaper articles suggesting the number of video games played by kids today is the cause of diabetes, along with other chronic diseases. Doubt it, but, hey, you can't fix stupid. Those of us who deal with this disease every day are stuck listening to assumptions and unprofessional opinions of what causes it. No matter how many times I explain Type 1 is caused by an auto-immune reaction in the body and the pancreas no longer has cells to produce insulin, there's another idiot behind them claiming my kid just needs a teaspoon of cinnamon each day to FIX this. Or a Paleo, vegan, low carb diet, exercise, etc. to get off insulin. (Insert frustrated swear words here.)
- Teachers who have been told not to confiscate her phone because she may need to contact me regarding her disease -- yet conveniently forget this and make her fight for it because, you know, all teenagers have an attitude problem. Not to be rude, but, if you refuse to follow the rules laid out for you, how do you expect a teen to follow yours?
- Medical professionals who automatically assume you have no consequences in place when said teenager forgets to give insulin when she eats. Oh, she gets in shit, each and every time this happens. Trust me. However, she doesn't really seem to care at the moment so I keep doing my best to kick her in the ass to care for this damned disease. I'm not with her every second of the day. Since I've always worked, I've never been with her every second of every day.
- Medical professionals who don't ask questions about submitted numbers are very annoying. Do I get you are only as good as the information you are given? Yep. When you see gaps, maybe you should question what was going on that day instead of snapping off a judgement about what you THINK was going on and tell us you are unable to help -- because, ya, my kid actually WAS testing 4 + times a day -- just on a meter that didn't connect to her pump. There were also days she really didn't eat until 3 p.m. (Saturday's and Sunday's -- cuz you know teens are notorious for sleeping till 1 or 2 p.m.) but was accused of not giving insulin. Since you asked to see these numbers, I don't really check them closely before sending them to you, automatically filling in the holes -- but I guess I should because questions don't seem to be a thing in your world... Plus, I keep manual records with info on it that can't be entered into the pump eg. illness, headache, monthly girl problems, which numbers are caused by not giving insulin -- cuz not all highs are caused by that -- some are completely unexplainable. Give me something constructive to work with. Or better yet, just don't say anything. A working pancreas adjusts insulin levels 3600 times per hour, if I remember that correctly. Try making that many adjustments manually...
- Even though you are a medical professional who deals constantly with this disease and a variety of people, doesn't mean you fully understand it -- unless, of course, you have lived with it yourself. These are the medical pros I wish there were more of. They understand you can do exactly the same thing for an entire week and get different results each day. They don't judge because they know you are doing your best. They know you are exhausted and probably haven't slept a full night since diagnosis. They offer encouragement and kindness instead.
Please don't tell me that cinnamon totally regulates your blood sugar levels -- even though you have a fully working pancreas. Or that eating too much sugar caused my kid's chronic disease. Or have you tried -- insert totally ridiculous suggestion here -- to cure her? Seriously, if it was that simple to cure this disease, don't you think it would have been eradicated by now???
Please, as a professional, before you comment, ask questions. Make sure you know what place we are at. Just because we aren't new to this disease, doesn't mean we aren't struggling in one area. We still need support -- even if it's just someone who understands the disease and the level of difficulty it presents, both emotionally and physically.
If you are just a regular person, ask me all the questions you want. I'll explain how this disease works in our world, but, remember, it affects everyone differently. What works for my girl may not work for the next person you run into with this disease. There is currently no cure -- although millions of people wish there were. Please. Stop spreading misinformation.
Eating too much sugar or being sedentary does not cause any type of diabetes. It may be a factor but not necessarily a THE cause. Genetics also play a very strong role and poor life style choices may simply Type 2 to the forefront.
I think it's terribly unfair to blame anyone with Type 2 diabetes for a disease they probably could not have prevented. We certainly don't blame cancer patients for their disease -- even though they may have exposed themselves to cancer causing things in their lifestyles, such as tanning beds or cigarettes. Nor do we blame people with heart disease for eating too much salt or red meats. It just is.
So let's stop blaming people with diabetes for their disease. They didn't cause it either.
#typeonediabetes
#diabetes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)